Home

Wine is a luxury of being home.

Sure, I have my cellar in my home and I am writing this sitting on the front porch of my home while sipping the remains of the 2008 Tercero Grenache Blanc Camp 4 that I opened yesterday (it has only gotten better!).  We share simple family meals with a glass of wine, or have extravagant dinner parties where wine and fellowship are shared in abundance.  But that’s not my point.

Wine is not the product of nomads.  It takes years for a newly planted grapevine to produce enough fruit to make wine.  The vines need tending, the fruit needs harvesting, and the juice needs a place to undergo its transformation into wine.  Fermentation, racking, aging, bottling, storing — these are all activities that require settlement.  One of the markers that researchers and archeologists use to determine when bands of people moved from wandering to being settled is the presence of viticulture and winemaking.

Certainly wine (of sorts) can be made by nomads who find fruit, pick it, crush it, and allow natural fermentation to happen as they continue along their journey.  But viticulture, growing grapes to produce wine, simply can’t be done on the move.

In the Biblical story of the flood (with Noah and the ark), one of the first things Noah was instructed to do when the water receded was to plant a vineyard.  Those vines were a strong symbol that Noah and his kin were no longer displaced; they were now home.

The implications of wine being a product of settlement, security, having a “place” and land, are many and rich.

While I will no doubt wax on profusely about all of this at another time, I want to end here by suggesting a connection between this concept and one of my newest favorite wineries:  Saarloos & Sons.  They are making some wonderful wines and serve them in this home built in 1886 which they call simply, “House.”

Each of the wines that Keith Saarloos (son) makes is connected to stories of home — stories from the vineyards where the wines had their birth as well as stories of family and ancestors whose memories and legacies are captured and honored in the naming of their bottlings.  Their family creed says it all:  “We live to honor those that have come before us, and to prepare the way for those yet to come.”  An example of their somewhat odd wine naming is their “Purper Hart.”  Not a misspelling.  It’s the Dutch translation of “Purple Heart.”  The wine (an amazing Syrah) honors John Saarloos, a member of their family who received the Purple Heart for his service in WWII.

These wines, and all wines, are connected to the land, to the people who make them, and to those who delight in drinking them.

You see… it’s about home.

A Lesson on Bias: Fess Parker Winery

I confess that I have had a bias against Fess Parker wines for many years. The winery itself is gorgeous, nestled in the midst of mature vineyards along a picturesque winding road in the Santa Ynez Valley. On one of my early visits to the winery (early 1990s) we met Fess Parker himself, and were pleased to have “Davy Crocket” (or “Daniel Boone” if you prefer) autograph one of his bottles of Pinot Noir for us. It was quaint, though the facade of a skilled Hollywood production was obvious. This guy knew how to market wine… even wine that was quite unremarkable. Over the next few years, the number of tour buses visiting the winery increased, the array of products available in the tasting room eclipsed the varieties of wines, and the wines themselves… well, they remained unremarkable. So I stopped visiting Fess Parker Winery, and probably raised my nose a bit every time I drove by on my way to one of the lesser known wineries up the road.

That was until last week. One of the area’s most interesting new wine makers, Larry Schaffer, met us for a private tasting of his Tercero Wines (see yesterday’s review of his Outlier Gewurtztraminer). I came to find out that Larry is on the wine making staff of Fess Parker Winery. That got my interest. Larry spoke very highly of Blair Fox, the head winemaker at Fess Parker, and gave me a different prespective on the resources that are available to the wine making team as part of a larger enterprise. They have the luxury of selecting only certain barrels to include in their finest wines — a reality not available to the smallest producers. They have the resources to have a wine making staff, not just one winemaker and one palate shaping the wine.

Still, what made me visit Fess Parker Winery again was its accessibility to less well-trained wine consumers… I took my mother-in-law. She likes wine out of a box. White Zinfandel is her wine of choice. She wouldn’t like Tercero’s complex flavors or the big flavors in Beckmen’s juice. Of all the wineries in the valley, the one bearing the mark of the ‘coon skin cap is the one she’ll like the best.

I had set up a private tasting at Fess Parker with Larry Schaffer, assistant winemaker, to guide our experience. The first wine was a Santa Barbara County Chardonnay. I almost skipped the pour. Larry’s expressive face told me to try it. The wine had a clean, elegant aroma that got my attention. THIS is Fess Parker’s wine? I sipped and was instantly humbled. This is a new kind of wine from Fess Parker. Thinking it might be a fluke, I was still reluctant as we continued the tasting. Boy was I wrong. This team of winemakers is doing something really interesting — they are exploiting the resources available to them to create some really fine wine.

We bought two bottles — I’d have bought more if we weren’t restricted by our need to take it home on an airplane. The chardonnay would be a gift for the couple taking care of my mother-in-law’s dog (nice gift!), and I’d keep the wine that changed my mind about this winery — the 2005 Syrah “The Big Easy.” They have captured some of Santa Ynez Valley’s finest Syrah character in that bottle. See some of my impressions in the review below.

Oh, and fortunately I’ve still got that autographed bottle on display in my wine cellar at home.

Fess Parker Winery Website

Wine Blog Paralysis & Wine as Sabbath Enactment

I love to write.  I’m in a profession that writes a lot.  I write for work, I write for leisure, I write for introspection, I write to stay connected wtih people, I write to provoke thought and conversation.  I like a good computer keyboard and excellent fountain pens — tools for this practice of writing.  So blogging is a natural thing.

But sometimes I get paralyzed by the backlog of things I need to blog about and I end up not writing at all.  I’ve got a bunch of wine reviews from my Wine Ministry tastings at CTS that still need to get posted.  It takes a while to do those — reviewing my notes, carefully writing the review, formatting the entry, finding the label or bottle image, etc.  Sometimes it just doesn’t feel right to write other things with the task list undone.

So I was thinking…  I don’t drink wine everyday, but usually at least two or three nights a week I’ll enjoy a glass — with a meal or just sipping while unwinding from the day.  The “to do list” certainly isn’t done, but the glass of wine is almost an enactment of sabbath.  There is always work to be done, but sabbath is an intentional break from work and opportunity for attentiveness to things other than work.  For some of us the enjoyment and experience of wine is both a symbol and practice of sabbath.

Blogging, wine, and sabbath.  Here’s the connection:  the “need to do” things will always be there.  For most of us, particularly if we have slightest bit of compulsivity in our personalities, those things will get done.  But allowing for the gift of sabbath, a break from the routine of work, will nurture our souls, our minds, our bodies.  So I’ll get the reviews posted, but I’ll also take time to write other ideas, reflections, and musings.  I’ll open that “special occasion” wine just because it’s sabbath.  I’ll also extend the invitation to you to consider sabbath practices in the midst of your worlds of work, tasks, and things needing to get done.  Cheers!

A Note About Ratings

Rating wines is absolutely subjective. The points (and even the tasting notes) ascribed to a particular wine are the opinions of the reviewer and reflect the rater’s own tastes, biases, and preferences. I make no claim to be able to give wines an objective tasting, review, or rating. If your palate and tastes are similar to mine then you’ll probably agree with my reviews. If, however, you prefer a different style of wine, you’ll most likely wonder which planet I have visited in order to give a particular score.

I’m good with this diversity of experiences of wine. In fact, I cherish it. But that’s the subject of a different blog post. For now, I want to give a brief summary of what the numbers mean to me. Here is the scale I use when rating wines. It reflects the scale used by most wine reviewers and what you’ll see on store shelves. I think it’s really funny that the scale really begins at 50. But as one who has continued academic study for most of my life, I’m familiar with odd grading/scoring scales… Here it is:

Extraordinary (96-100 points)
Outstanding (90-95)
Very Good to Excellent (85-89)
Good (80-84)
Average (75-79)
Below average (70-74)
Avoid (50-70)

Blessings

Barukh atah Adonai, Eloheinu, melekh ha-olam
Blessed are You, Lord our God, King of the Universe,

borei p’ri hagafen (Amein)
Who creates the fruit of the vine.  (Amen)

It has been a quiet Saturday at the end of a full week. Some of the blessings of this day and the days of the past week…

• Attentiveness to practices, particularly hospitality, blessing, and prayer
• Coffee and a bagel, a sunny morning, and good conversation with Rob and Paul
• Colleagues in ministry, time to study and learn, a community of inquiry
• Katie’s giggles that send me, even when I can only hear them on the phone
• Kerri whose love and support is boundless
• Seeing friends from Pleasant Hill, and the good people of Gwinnett being good enough to celebrate the occasion with fabulous fireworks
• Wine Ministry and communities that deepen around the fruit of the vine
• The terroir of Bordeaux and the Rhone River Valley
• The terroir that imparts taste and texture in the stories and people I have encountered this week
• BBT’s laugh
• Rob’s anticipation of parenthood
• Prosecco with a slice of ripe strawberry
• Belly laughing with Mark, Mary, David, Bekah, Matt, Chris, and Paul — the 2006 Waterwheel Memsie might have contributed to the spirit in the room
• Time to write and things to write about
• South Carolina peaches
• The Dekalb Farmers Market and Sherlock’s Wine Merchant
• Raindrops on my window that now look like shimmering diamonds with the sun shining through them
• Paul’s Red Wine and Blues song — in process
• Mudhouse Sabbath by Lauren Winner
• Domaine de Perilliere Cotes du Rhone

For these and all thy gifts I give thee thanks O Lord.

Wine Ministry at Columbia Seminary – Summer 2008

 

It’s officially a tradition now.  I prefer to call it a practice.  But whatever we call it, this is now the third incarnation of “Wine Ministry” as part of the Doctor of Ministry program at Columbia Theological Seminary.  Last summer we inaugurated the practice, carried it on in New York City in January of this year, and now we meet again — this time in the upstairs lounge of the Harrington Center each afternoon around 5:00.  It’s not a bad way to transition from a day of study and learning into whatever the evening holds (usually more reading and/or writing).

To be sure it’s a time of drinking wine.  We put together interesting tastings — so far we’ve had big chewy reds, Spanish delights, and the terroir of the Cabernet grape.  Tonight we’ll be sauntering through the Rhone River Valley (and a few other places the lovely Syrah grape has been transplanted).  Tasting notes of each of these wines will come soon.

But this is more than wine.  Wine is simply the practice that facilitates what is really happening.  The community being formed among doctoral students from around the country is what it’s really about.  We laugh heartily, tell stories, and connect with each others’ lives in ways that will be indelible (much like the stains of red wine in the shorts I was wearing last night).  Others bring a bottle of wine or food to share, the circle gets wider, and the feast just happens.  It’s a feast of wonderful tastes and new experiences of wine, it’s a feast of friendship, it’s a feast of lives connecting with one another.  We’re all theologians and pastors, so we talk theology and ministry.  But all that talk is more sublime and insightful when the words are blended with the flavors of Bordeaux and Malbec.

I raise my glass to this gift of time and friendship.  I toast the lives of those with whom I have shared the sacred juice of the vine.  And I even toast the Spirit of God whose presence is as flavorful, complex, and delightful as the wines we have shared.

Martha Stewart Makes Wine (not!)

 

There has been an announcement in the wine world that Martha Stewart has entered into an agreement with E&J Gallo to bottle wine for her under the label “Martha Stewart Vintage.”  Check out these stories about this news:  Tom Wark’s Fermentation and the San Francisco Chronicle.

 I am fascinated by this collaboration.  This kind of practice in the wine world is nothing new — wine makers make wine for other people’s labels all the time.  The good folks at Trader Joe’s are making a mint off the enormous volume of sales of it’s Charles Shaw wines (aka “Two Buck Chuck”) — wine that is made by the Bronco Wine Company.  The Charles Shaw wines purport to be from Napa (check out the label sometime), but the grapes are actually grown in the much-less-desirable Central Valley of California.  Think Bakersfield.  And the bottle says “Charles Shaw,” not Bronco Wines.  And it would be misleading to assume this only affects “low end” wine and wineries.  Even the biggest name wineries engage in this lucrative practice.  It happens throughout the wine world.

The Martha Stewart announcement provides a helpful lens, though, for some reflection on this practice and its implications beyond the world of wine.  This is rich ground for musing — I love this!  Wine as a commodity.  Wine as a product.  Wine as a pawn in the world of commerce.  The art of winemaking reduced to signatures on a contract.  I can see a new reality TV show in the making… Martha Stewart Vineyard versus Two Buck Chuck.  I’d watch just to see the divas actually drink what’s in the bottles that bear their names!

But there is more to this story than just the raw commerce of it all. There is something about character and the character of wine. The wines labeled “Martha Stewart Vineyard” will NOT be from Martha’s Vineyard (so to speak). The illusion is that they will bear the sophistication of the cashmere sweater and pressed linen napkins of a Martha Stewart afternoon tea. But there is no authenticity. It is a fraud. It lacks integrity. It’s plagiarism — the signature on the artist’s canvas had nothing to do with the creation of the art (even if the art, as in this case, is like mass-produced “Velvet Elvis” prints that can be purchased at any flea market). But it’s intentional — Martha (rather, the Martha Industry) will want her consumers to assume the wine is of her own making.

Perhaps the charitable thing to do would be to wish Martha well, and to join in a chorus of “cheers!” with those who will drink her (er, I mean Gallo’s) wine. But then I myself would be inauthentic.

More thoughts about this later…

Words on Wine

There are lots of words about wine on the web.  I’m doing my part to add to those missives, though I have to hope that I am adding QUALITY, not just quantity.  There are words reflecting on wine, wine culture, wine production, wine sales, and of course on wines themselves.  Lots of words.

I’m beginning the process of building my collection of links to other wine blogs.  Check out some of the blogs that I’m reading — they’re over there on the right side.  Just don’t decide that you like one of those better than WineMinistry.com!!!  Actually, a couple of things I like about the wine community:

— There are some great writers in the blogosphere, and I love it when people from different walks of life and different perspectives offer their thoughts to the world.

— There are lots of different opinions, and by exposing ourselves to those opinions we gain something (even when we don’t agree).

— There is generally an openness in people who are passionate about wine, and that is refreshing in a culture when we get divided too easily into left-right, either-or, red-white…

— I could go on and on, but the bottom line is that there is some good reading to be had.  Let me know if you’ve got some favorites that aren’t listed here.  I haven’t put all of my favorites up yet, and I am always looking for more…

Enjoy the reading.  Enjoy the community!

Blends: Community in a Bottle?

Are “Varietal Wines” a reflection of individualism?  Are “Blends” an embodiment of community? 

A quick wine education:

Varietal Wine.  A varietal wine is one made primarily with a single type of grape.  Cabernet Sauvignon, Pinot Noir, Syrah, Chardonnay, and Sauvignon Blanc are a few examples of the plethora of specific grape varieties that are made into wine.  In the U.S. a wine must be made from at least 75% of the primary grape to be labeled with that grape varietal name.  Different grapes have unique flavors and aromas.  A Zinfandel (NOT the pink variety), for example, is characteristically peppery along with its wild fruit flavors.  Sauvignon Blanc is usually herbal with citrus overtones.

Blends.  In contrast to wines made from a single varietal, a blend is made from several different grape types.  There are a couple of different types of blends.  Varietal Combinations are made from two or three grapes and labeled according to the identity of the components:  Cabernet Sauvignon-Shiraz or Charonnay-Semillion are two popular combinations from Australia.  Another type of blend is the artisan blend which turns the winemaker into artist whose palate includes various types of wines that can be combined into a unique blend with a creative name to match.  “Meritage” is one of these blends that is reflective of the style of winemaking from the Bordeaux region of France.  It is interesting that some of the cheapest wine and some of the most expensive wines are blends.

New World and Old World.  There are a lot of differences between “Old World” and “New World” wines, including the basic issue of what to put into the bottle.  Wines from the “New World” (unpacking that could be another blog post!) are typically made and labeled according to varietal.  These include wines from the United States, Australia, Chile, South Africa, Argentina, etc.  In contrast, “Old World” wines from the classic wine making regions of Europe (France, Italy, Germany, Austria, Spain, etc.) are labeled by Appelation and contain a blend of several different grapes grown in those areas.  Bordeaux, for example, is a geographic area, not a type of grape.  But Bordeaux wines are among the most famous in the world — and are made by blending grapes like Cabernet Sauvignon, Merlot, Cabernet France, Petit Verdot, and a few others.  The characteristic is that these grapes are grown in the appelation.  Some wineries within these areas are producing “Varietal Wines,” but that is mostly a response to market trends.

I like both Old World and New World wines.  I like both “varietal wine” and “blends.”  I am quickly growing in my appreciation of blended wines.  Bringing the various unique flavors of varietals into a new mix creates some exquisite flavors.  More about this in a later post.

Varietal and Blends, Individualism and Community

As I reflect on this fundamental aspect of wine I am intrigued by the metaphor of “varietal” wines as an expression of individualism and “blends” as an embodiment of community.  The approach to single-varietal wines is to “be the best that you can be” by emphasizing an individual grape’s strengths and uniqueness.  Isn’t it interesting that this is the “New World” approach to winemaking?  We in the United States have been shaped in ways we can’t even imagine by our fundamental commitment to the individual.  So it’s no wonder this is the predominant wine-making style in the U.S.  It is also no surprise that varietal wines sell better in the U.S. than blended wines.  The market drives the artistry of wine making.  And the market is shapes the popularity of wines.  Remember when Zinfandel was THE wine to drink?  We’re on the downward slope of Pinot Noir’s popularity, whose meteoric rise to fame was driven largely by the movie Sideways.

In contrast to the “star-in-the-spotlight” approach to varietal winemaking, blending intentionally combines the unique character of the individual components into a communal expression.  The individual varietals are significant, to be sure, but primarily in their ability to add to the complexity of the whole.  It’s perhaps a more difficult task to craft these wines as it involves creation of both the individual varietals and the skillful artistry of bringing the flavors together.

The metaphor has limits to be sure, but doesn’t this offer a glimpse into our human ways of being individuals and communities?  I am afraid that much of our modern world exploits the “varietal” approach.  We seem to value the achievement of individuals rather than the complexity of blends.

It would be easy to label this as the difference between Capitalism and Socialism.  To be sure, that is one expression of the difference.  But it goes deeper than economic or political ideology.  For me it goes to the heart of who we are.  On one hand personal achievement is a good value.  But it cannot be an end in itself.  There is a lot about me that is pretty good.  I have been crafted into a person whose gifts and talents are used in some good ways.  But I know that not only am I better when I am part of an interconnected community, I am intended to be connected.  My wife and I together are better than either of us individually.  The same is true for the office in which I work.  And it is true for the church community I serve.  And I would suggest that the same is true of all of our human communities.

The problem is that “the market” of our individualism keeps us separated.  We are divided around so many differences — gender, race, sexual orientation, economic level, education, national loyalties, etc.  So many systems and institutions in our world work very hard to keep these divisions in place.

I have a vision for our world and for each of us in it.  I imagine a world in which I can enjoy BOTH a fabulous Cabernet Sauvignon AND a Bordeaux (a varietal and a blend).  Where I can open a bottle of dark, jammy Sirah and be seduced by its oppulence AND where that same Sirah can be part of a complex, multi-layered Chateauneuf du Pape.  We don’t have to live in a world defined by either-or, New World versus Old World, varietal or blend.  There is room in my cellar for all of it…

Theology: Buying Wine By the Label

They are easy to spot.  They stand about 4 feet away from the rack of bottles in the wine section of the grocery store or even in the wine shop.  The position is indicative — close enough to see the labels, but too far away to actually read them.  They might even pick up a bottle or two for closer inspection, but most often it’s just to check the price (if it’s not printed on the rack below the wine.  Ever notice how big the print is below these bottles?).

These are the people who are choosing their wine by the label.  It is an aesthetic approach to wine.  Sort of.  It’s actually an aesthetic approach to label art.  Sort of.  You see, there is much more to wine label art than beauty.  Marketers figured out a long time ago how to evoke certain feelings by the images placed on a product, or by using certain colors, etc.  Some of the labels are beautiful:

     

   

  

 

Critters are common on labels.  Take a look at these:

   

         

I don’t know about you, but when I think about the aromas and flavors of wine I don’t immediately think of snails, frogs, elephants, cows, lizards, pigs, horses or much of anything from the wild kingdom.  But there are lots of those creatures and a whole lot more adorning the bottles on the store shelves.

 These make me scratch my head…

     

You may not know that there is a problem with ladybugs on grapes and with the wine-making process.  These cute little critters actually have an excretion that, when left on grapes or when (how to say this without grossing you out)… when the bugs get “pressed” along with the grapes… it creates “Ladybug Taint” in the finished wine.  No kidding — these little buggers can (and do) spoil whole vats of wine.  Why would someone advertize with ladybugs???

There are erotic labels, funny labels, and even kid-friendly labels (interesting when you think about it…).  Some have even gone so far as to fake a shape of the bottle and create a story around it — that the wine is aged underground and the weight of the dirt distorts the shape of the bottle over time, or that the bottle resembles the graceful growth of old grape vines.  It even has sprayed on “dirt” (paint) to make it look like the bottle has been extracted from the wine maker’s cellaring cave after a century or so of delicate aging.

This is actually not a horrible wine.  But amid the dozens of Chateauneuf du Pape’s on the shelf, wouldn’t you want THIS one???

And that’s the point.  Marketers are working hard to have you pick THIS wine over THAT wine.  And if an appealing label will make that happen, then their work has paid off.

Have I ever picked wine by the label?  Of course!  Sometimes the wine has been pretty good, too.  Other times… well, the label was nice!

But here’s the point.  The look of the label doesn’t tell you much about what’s on the inside.  I know a lot of people who have shopped for dates or romance by “label shopping.”  And as much as we might not want to admit it, in our culture looks matter.  And boy doesn’t that contradict virtually every gospel value that we consider.  We know not to judge books by their covers, but how about the person we want as our leader, or spokesperson, or partner, or self?

The best wines I’ve had in my life have pretty unremarkable labels.  But pop the cork, look at the beauty of the hues that emerge, take in the aromas of mature wine, and taste the layers of character and depth in each sip.  Those are the wines I hope to enjoy each time I open a bottle.  And they are the wines I want to share with my friends.

I think those wines have something to teach us about the labels we use — whether to make decisions about wine… or people.

Great Wine Quote

While I didn’t much care for the movie, this quote is a keeper… 

“I like to think about the life of wine, how it is a living thing. I like to think about what was going on the year the grapes were growing. How the sun was shining, if it rained. I like to think about all the people who tended and picked the grapes. And if it’s an old wine, how many of them must be dead by now. I like how wine continues to evolve, like if I opened a bottle of wine today it would taste different than if I’d opened it on any other day, because a bottle of wine is actually alive. And it’s constantly evolving and gaining complexity, that is until it peaks, like your ’61. And then it begins its steady inevitable decline.”

–Maya, from the movie Sideways (2004)

“Special Occasion” Wines

Most of us have a least one or two of these bottles laying in our wine stash — those bottles that we are saving for a “special occasion.”  I’ve got at least 200 bottles in the cellar that fall into this category.  We’re holding onto the wine for a dinner that is just special enough to bring out the “good wine.”  Or maybe it’s a dinner with just the right friends who will appreciate the wine, or a “power dinner” with the clients or boss who will be duly impressed.

     

Or it might be that we’re just so fond of collecting wine that we’re not wanting to part with the precious objects of our compulsion.  The wine racks look so nice filled with these expensive bottles of wine!

But the point is that with this kind of wine, we often find ourselves waiting to drink it.  Many of us have had the sad experience of waiting too long, only to open the wine to find it past its prime, or worse yet to discover that it is now rancid vinegar.

I was talking to friends at church this morning who just got a shipment of fine California wine, sent to them from the vineyard following a recent visit on their vacation.  I joked with them about whether or not they would be able to ever drink the wine, or if they’d be saving it for “special occasions.”  She mused that it would be difficult — that every bottle has memories attached to it.  Her husband, Ed, had the perfect line, though…

“The act of opening the bottle of wine is, itself, a special occasion.”

Amen, brother!

So here I sit on a rainy NE Ohio afternoon writing on my blog.  My wife and daughter are napping.  It’s a quiet afternoon.  Nothing special.  But I’ll tell you a secret.  I opened a 2002 Gainey Vineyard Merlot Limited Selection.  It’s a special occasion!

Here’s my invitation, dear readers.  Today is a gift.  Celebrate that gift with a “special occasion” bottle of wine!  Cheers!

Wine Theology: Wine Facilitates Community

My “wine theology” has many facets, but one of the cornerstones is that wine facilitates community.  Some will immediately think of “drinking buddies,” the camaraderie that forms when sobriety is lost, or the fact that wine is one of the most acceptable “social” drinks.  But none of these experiences captures the deeper realities of authentic community.  One of the main reasons that I am an Oenophile is that I cherish the relationships that can be nurtured in the love, learning, and consumption of wine.

Authentic community is such a rare thing in our modern culture.  All too often we become isolated in the small spheres of our individual “worlds.”  Community is the antithesis to isolation.  Rather than “me” language, we use “we” language in authentic communities because we find ourselves inextricably connected with others.  The nature of community is that it provides a place where our true identities can be revealed without fear of rejection and that others who risk the same become part of us.  “Family of choice” is one way to describe this unique way of being connected and committed to each other.

In the simplest of terms, wine facilitates this kind of community because it becomes a starting point for conversation and offers a common ground of shared experience.  Sharing the aromas, tastes, and even language about wine can lead a group of people into deeper connection with one another.

But it’s not just about the wine.  It’s about what the culture of wine can help create – authentic community as an alternative to the prevailing individualism of our culture.
More on this later…  I cherish your thoughts!