Martha Stewart Makes Wine (not!)

 

There has been an announcement in the wine world that Martha Stewart has entered into an agreement with E&J Gallo to bottle wine for her under the label “Martha Stewart Vintage.”  Check out these stories about this news:  Tom Wark’s Fermentation and the San Francisco Chronicle.

 I am fascinated by this collaboration.  This kind of practice in the wine world is nothing new — wine makers make wine for other people’s labels all the time.  The good folks at Trader Joe’s are making a mint off the enormous volume of sales of it’s Charles Shaw wines (aka “Two Buck Chuck”) — wine that is made by the Bronco Wine Company.  The Charles Shaw wines purport to be from Napa (check out the label sometime), but the grapes are actually grown in the much-less-desirable Central Valley of California.  Think Bakersfield.  And the bottle says “Charles Shaw,” not Bronco Wines.  And it would be misleading to assume this only affects “low end” wine and wineries.  Even the biggest name wineries engage in this lucrative practice.  It happens throughout the wine world.

The Martha Stewart announcement provides a helpful lens, though, for some reflection on this practice and its implications beyond the world of wine.  This is rich ground for musing — I love this!  Wine as a commodity.  Wine as a product.  Wine as a pawn in the world of commerce.  The art of winemaking reduced to signatures on a contract.  I can see a new reality TV show in the making… Martha Stewart Vineyard versus Two Buck Chuck.  I’d watch just to see the divas actually drink what’s in the bottles that bear their names!

But there is more to this story than just the raw commerce of it all. There is something about character and the character of wine. The wines labeled “Martha Stewart Vineyard” will NOT be from Martha’s Vineyard (so to speak). The illusion is that they will bear the sophistication of the cashmere sweater and pressed linen napkins of a Martha Stewart afternoon tea. But there is no authenticity. It is a fraud. It lacks integrity. It’s plagiarism — the signature on the artist’s canvas had nothing to do with the creation of the art (even if the art, as in this case, is like mass-produced “Velvet Elvis” prints that can be purchased at any flea market). But it’s intentional — Martha (rather, the Martha Industry) will want her consumers to assume the wine is of her own making.

Perhaps the charitable thing to do would be to wish Martha well, and to join in a chorus of “cheers!” with those who will drink her (er, I mean Gallo’s) wine. But then I myself would be inauthentic.

More thoughts about this later…

Advertisements

4 Comments

  1. Very well delivered message. Yes you are so right in stating that Martha’s wines lack authenticity. It is capitalism in its truest form where all that matters is the bottom line. I just finished an entry on my blog about Martha’s wine. Will Martha be serving her wine to her inner circle of friends?

    Reply

  2. Ah, I think you guys need to lighten up. Who cares if Martha puts her name on a bottle of wine? Anyone who is a real connoiseur will probably stear clear. But if Martha’s name on a bottle encourages a novice to try and partake and become involved with wine, then what’s the harm?

    Reply

  3. Here’s the thing. Most wines aren’t really “made” by the people who say they make them. Typically, there’s a rich person who owns it all but does absolutely nothing. A wine is really made by low-wage immigrants from planting to bottle.

    Even most famous celebrity winemakers have very little contact with the production of wine. Many of the articles written about winemakers are puff pieces, and have little to do with reality. Their stories are crafted by PR teams and spun around the media.

    Yeah, Martha doesn’t maker he wine. But neither does Robert Mondavi.

    Reply

  4. Yeah, I think it stinks. But it’s nothing new. Here in Maryland there is a burgeoning wine industry and most of it is (sorry) plonk. Some of the most palatable (I am told) comes from one of the largest vintners, Boordy. But none of it is Maryland grown grape. It’s all juice from the west coast.

    I don’t know if this is the same thing, but it smacks of a certain dishonesty. But like Sharon said, nobody I know will probably buy it. And I don’t know too many connoiseurs. Which might touch upon an earlier post of yours -buying wine by the label. I don’t think you can look too hip with a bottle of Martha Stewart under your arm. Now if I could just get my hands on a nice ’04 Oprah cabernet…..

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s